Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
From: Dave Horsfall (dave_at_horsfall.org)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- In reply to: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:32 +1000 (EST) To: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Mike Maltese wrote:
> > Is this release considered stable? It isn't even mentioned on the
> > FreeBSD page. Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X
> > instead?
>
> Yes, 4.10-BETA == 4-STABLE.
Thanks; I was worried for a while :-)
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- In reply to: Mike Maltese: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]