Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
From: Dave Horsfall (dave_at_horsfall.org)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Dave Horsfall: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- In reply to: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:16:14 +1000 (EST) To: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
> > in for?
>
> They're in src/release, but you do have STABLE. The "BETA" in 4.10-BETA
> means that we're considering this code for release as 4.10-RELEASE, and
> that's all.
Many thanks.
-- Dave, who remembers horrible Unices that weren't released but escaped...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dave Horsfall: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- In reply to: Ceri Davies: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]