Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
From: Michael Nottebrock (michaelnottebrock_at_gmx.net)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Brandon Fos***: "4.10-BETA boot stops at ad0"
- In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:21:38 +0200
On Thursday 22 April 2004 16:16, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
> > > in for?
> >
> > They're in src/release, but you do have STABLE. The "BETA" in 4.10-BETA
> > means that we're considering this code for release as 4.10-RELEASE, and
> > that's all.
>
> Many thanks.
Btw, this is a FAQ - and it's in the FAQ, too.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE
-- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: signature
- Previous message: Brandon Fos***: "4.10-BETA boot stops at ad0"
- In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]