Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?

From: Stefan Wessels Beljaars (stefan_at_maryjane.nl)
Date: 04/22/04

  • Next message: Marius M. Rex MARIUS: "Re: Networking issue in 4.9-Stable (was: Diagnosing hardware issue?)"
    To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
    Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:11:22 +0200
    
    

    On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:58, Dave Horsfall wrote:
    > I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7
    > to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and "make buildworld" etc.
    >
    > Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
    >
    > Is this release considered stable? It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD
    > page. Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead?
    >
    if u use RELENG_4_10, cvsup, do a buildworld/installworld by the (hand)book,
    you will get 4.10-RC.

    > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
    > in for?
    >
    > -- Dave
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

    Stefan
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Marius M. Rex MARIUS: "Re: Networking issue in 4.9-Stable (was: Diagnosing hardware issue?)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Is 4.10-BETA stable?
      ... I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, ... imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead... ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
      ... > I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, ... It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD ... Ceri ...
      (freebsd-stable)