Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?

• Previous message: Marius M. Rex MARIUS: "Re: Networking issue in 4.9-Stable (was: Diagnosing hardware issue?)"
• In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:28:22 -0600 (MDT)
To: dave@horsfall.org

In message: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
            Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> writes:
: Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...

It appears that re changed the way they are tagging releases again.
The last time we had 4.x-BETA was 4.2. A review of the cvs log for
the newvers.sh file shows that 5.1 and 5.2 had a BETA release, but all
other 4.x releases since 4.3 went through the sequence

4.x-STABLE -> 4.x+1-PRERELEASE -> 4.x+1-RC -> 4.x+1-STABLE

You'll have to ask re@ why this wasn't done this time.

Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

• Previous message: Marius M. Rex MARIUS: "Re: Networking issue in 4.9-Stable (was: Diagnosing hardware issue?)"
• In reply to: Dave Horsfall: "Is 4.10-BETA stable?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]