Re: FreeBSD Eol's?
From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 04/24/04
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Sophos and compat3x dependency"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Next in thread: MikeM: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Reply: MikeM: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Reply: Roman Neuhauser: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:39:57 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
At 14:22 24/04/2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>4.8 passed its expiry date and was extended. 4.9 will probably be
>extended at a later date too.
Looks like Kris got a bit confused here. :-)
The idea behind the extended support branches is that *selected*
releases will be supported for at least 24 months; this allows us to
offer extended support to people who can't upgrade on a regular basis,
while keeping the number of supported branches to a manageable level.
We haven't yet decided which future branches will qualify for
extended support, but it is quite unlikely that this set would include
FreeBSD 4.9.
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Sophos and compat3x dependency"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Next in thread: MikeM: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Reply: MikeM: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Reply: Roman Neuhauser: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]