BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?

From: Eugene Grosbein (eugen_at_kuzbass.ru)
Date: 04/26/04

  • Next message: Roman Neuhauser: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"
    Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:37:22 +0800
    To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
    
    

    Hi!

    What is the current status of BGP MD5 support for STABLE branch?
    I know that STABLE has TCP_SIGNATURE kernel option for basic compatibility
    with Cisco BGP neighbors but wonder if zebra/quagga/something have
    RFC 2385 support for FreeBSD?

    Are there corresponding patches for routing daemons available to public?

    Eugene Grosbein
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Roman Neuhauser: "Re: FreeBSD Eol's?"

    Relevant Pages

    • BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?
      ... What is the current status of BGP MD5 support for STABLE branch? ... I know that STABLE has TCP_SIGNATURE kernel option for basic compatibility ... with Cisco BGP neighbors but wonder if zebra/quagga/something have ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • [SPAM] BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?
      ... What is the current status of BGP MD5 support for STABLE branch? ... with Cisco BGP neighbors but wonder if zebra/quagga/something have ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-net)