Re: KVA Issue?

From: Matthew Seaman (m.seaman_at_infracaninophile.co.uk)
Date: 05/26/04

  • Next message: Scott Long: "Re: KVA Issue?"
    Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:17:32 +0100
    To: bjohns123@msn.com
    
    
    

    On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:09:49PM -0400, lost inferno wrote:
    > I was wondering... and thought i'd comment on something i've read... is
    > there something going on
    > in the kva area that's bad? (AKA exaustion through malloc routine) I found
    > something that made me curious, and thought I'd see what you thought. I'm
    > really debating now about what i should move my production machines to.
    > They claim to have a patch...
    >
    > http://gobsd.com/node/view/39
    >
    > Interested to see what everyone thinks.

    I don't know enough to judge if that patch is correct or not, but the
    description "very unstable" is a bit exaggerated. This is not a
    condition that will see your machine blowing up and falling over every
    ten minutes, or even every 10 days. In fact you'll only run into it
    if you are running your machine particularly hard and doing memory
    intensive things. If it was as bad as that article makes out there
    would be an unending series of complaining e-mails to this list, the
    freebsd-stable list, the freebsd-hackers list and probably any five
    other freebsd mailing lists you care to mention. That just hasn't
    happened.

    Remember that the whole DragonFly BSD fork was the result not just of
    arguments about the technical direction of the FreeBSD project, but
    due in part to personality conflicts and politicking between various
    cliques of FreeBSD developers. It's quite possible that the patches'
    author still has issues with some members of the FreeBSD project.

    By all means try out the patch provided. If you prefer, try out
    DragonFly BSD -- but I wouldn't go betting the whole business on it
    just yet. DFBSD has yet to make it's 1.0 release. Keep your
    production systems on one of the FreeBSD 4.x-RELEASE branches for the
    time being, and wait and see what happens with FreeBSD 5-STABLE and
    DragonFly BSD 1.0 release.

            Cheers,

            Matthew

    -- 
    Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                          Savill Way
    PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
    Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
    
    



  • Next message: Scott Long: "Re: KVA Issue?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today
      ... FreeBSD as base that would allow better teams cooperation and easy code ... control fly out the window from, say, the 42nd floor. ... If you think you need a vendor branch, take a look at mercurial patch ... Patch queues are quite powerful, and even though you end up versioning ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • RE: For the love of God, is it even possible to make the Atheros ath.patch & updated HALactually
      ... > # mv ath_hal_20051212 ath ... in hopes that maybe the patch was FINALLY ... This FreeBSD installation is sitting here doing ... To June/July 2005 madwifi was very unstable, after merging cvs BSD tree of ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:28.resolv
      ... > There's no patch for these, and in the case of the embedded ... >>FreeBSD only: NO ... In a few instances in the resolver code, ... >>can spoof DNS messages) may produce a specially crafted DNS message ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: FreeBSD 6.0 compat with DL320 G4
      ... The patch I created makes the broadcom chip work without panicing ... FreeBSD 6.0 compat with DL320 G4 ... this server also has bge interfaces and had no ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Jail Resource Limits for 6.x ...
      ... Why there are SoC projects, which never come in to src tree or wider publicity? ... Per the recent announcement on the freebsd-announce mailing list and on the web site, you can learn more about the SoC projects by visiting the FreeBSD web page, and also the FreeBSD wiki which contains more detailed information on each project: ... However, many students have started, and already put information about their projects online. ... Somebody did patch with new / experimental features and almost nobody knows about it. ...
      (freebsd-stable)