Penalty of using unsupported ServerWorks GC-SL chipset?
From: Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir (blacksir_at_number.ru)
Date: 05/27/04
- Previous message: Chris Dillon: "Re: NATD Issue"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: Penalty of using unsupported ServerWorks GC-SL chipset?"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: Penalty of using unsupported ServerWorks GC-SL chipset?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:01:06 +0400
What penalty of using Tyan motherboard on unsupported ServerWorks chipset GC-SL? I found a message in freebsd-questions: Benjamin
Thelen wrote that he tried using GC-SL and unable to use DMA on ATA. It's not my case - on MB I intrested there is a Promise 20270
RAID controller onboard, that supported (I asked Soren Schmidt). I apologise that there can be problems with USB,PCI or some other
things. Damn, HP, Fujitsu-Siemens and some local companies using only GC-SL for low-cost 1U server solutions :-(
Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Chris Dillon: "Re: NATD Issue"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: Penalty of using unsupported ServerWorks GC-SL chipset?"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: Penalty of using unsupported ServerWorks GC-SL chipset?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]