Re: nullfs in 4.10
From: Bjoern Koenig (bkoenig_at_cs.tu-berlin.de)
Date: 06/22/04
- Previous message: Andre Albsmeier: "Re: Should I merge fix for PR#64091 (NFS data corruption)?"
- Maybe in reply to: Eirik Oeverby: "nullfs in 4.10"
- Next in thread: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Reply: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Reply: Allan Fields: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:09:18 +0200
Hello,
first of all:
THIS FILESYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED
(READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT,
DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.
BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET.
My experience:
I had much less problems with unionfs -b, even with FreeBSD 4.10, to mount
for example /usr/ports into a jail temporarily. But for everything else you
should never use it.
Bjoern
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andre Albsmeier: "Re: Should I merge fix for PR#64091 (NFS data corruption)?"
- Maybe in reply to: Eirik Oeverby: "nullfs in 4.10"
- Next in thread: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Reply: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Reply: Allan Fields: "Re: nullfs in 4.10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|