Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?
From: David Magda (dmagda_at_ee.ryerson.ca)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Jonathan Chen: "Re: ``top'' and other process issues on 4.10-R"
- In reply to: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Next in thread: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Reply: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:37:06 -0400 To: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org>
On Jun 28, 2004, at 11:06, Matt Douhan wrote:
> why ?
>
> they may not be public machines at all and be isolated to an
> environment where
> security is not the primary concern
Have you not seen the SSH exploit in "The Matrix Reload"?!?! :> How do
you know some evil-doer wouldn't use an exploit from an internal
system? Heck, Slammer nailed a couple of networks (e.g., ATM) that were
supposedly secure in protected networks. No telling how a worm may jump
fire/airwalls.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jonathan Chen: "Re: ``top'' and other process issues on 4.10-R"
- In reply to: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Next in thread: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Reply: Matt Douhan: "Re: Maximum uptime 497 days?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]