Barry Bouwsma wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to include patches similar to (or based
> upon) the following diffs, in order to get `bsdtar' to compile
> cleanly under my (older) 4.x ...
Done. Thanks for the input. Let me know if you
find anything else.
Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission ... > I could build tools which record the secondary patches as diffs to ... The gives a perfect audit trail back to who authored each line. ... Another problem is that you need a central key repository.... (Linux-Kernel)
Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS ... >> Is it my fault that you applied neither Al Viro's patches to remove the ... > That won't make powerpc compile.... And it's my job to fix every single such bug before you'd accept ... on all architectures.... (Linux-Kernel)
Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission ... > If you took to sending your patches as the original patch plus another ... > one as a set of deltas, the next one as another set of deltas, and so on. ... > We can handle an arbitrary number of patches to patches to patches. ... > I could build tools which record the secondary patches as diffs to ... (Linux-Kernel)
Re: Security Patches & OpenBSD Newbie ...Patches for the base system requires compiling. ...Compile kernel, reboot, compile base, done. ... As for installed ports, most ports are also released as binary packages (at ... (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc)
