Re: What is Stable
From: Peter Jeremy (PeterJeremy_at_optushome.com.au)
Date: 08/23/04
- Previous message: Pete French: "Re: What is Stable"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:01:33 +1000 To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
On Mon, 2004-Aug-23 10:03:43 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>Can you clarify, what will be the policy of the RELENG_4 after it
>"becomes an Errata Branch"? Will it be passed to Security Officer,
>and no new featuress could be committed to this branch?
Presumably it will be treated the same way as RELENG_2_2 and RELENG_3.
The 'Code-Freeze Status' table at http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
shows both are "open" with no restrictions - since there will be no
further releases, re@ is not involved. (I suspect that the schedule
for it to become an Errata Branch depends on the success or otherwise
of 4.11 and 5.3 - it's possible that unforeseen circumstances could
result in a 4.12).
-- Peter Jeremy _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pete French: "Re: What is Stable"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|