Re: What is Stable
From: Charles Ulrich (charles_at_idealso.com)
Date: 08/23/04
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: What is Stable"
- In reply to: Pete French: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Geert Hendrickx: "Re: What is Stable"
- Reply: Geert Hendrickx: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:28:46 -0400 (EDT) To: "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Pete French said:
>> still considered stable. After the 5.3 release it is expected
>> 5.X will become stable. At that point I'm not sure what to call
>
> Is that the point at which this list becomes the correct place to ask
> questions about 5.X on as opposed to current ?
One way to know without keeping track of the details of release engineering is
to just bear in mind that the day on which the first 5.x-STABLE release is
announced on the freebsd.org webpage is also the day that this list becomes
appropriate for 5.x questions. I figure that's a pretty safe indicator.
-- Charles Ulrich System Administrator Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: What is Stable"
- In reply to: Pete French: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Geert Hendrickx: "Re: What is Stable"
- Reply: Geert Hendrickx: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]