Re: What is Stable
From: Geert Hendrickx (geert.hendrickx_at_ua.ac.be)
Date: 08/31/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: 4-stable termios diff behaviour lc/lc_r"
- In reply to: Charles Ulrich: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Kevin Oberman: "Re: What is Stable"
- Reply: Kevin Oberman: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:51:15 +0200 To: Charles Ulrich <charles@idealso.com>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:28:46AM -0400, Charles Ulrich wrote:
> Pete French said:
> >> still considered stable. After the 5.3 release it is expected
> >> 5.X will become stable. At that point I'm not sure what to call
> >
> > Is that the point at which this list becomes the correct place to ask
> > questions about 5.X on as opposed to current ?
>
> One way to know without keeping track of the details of release engineering is
> to just bear in mind that the day on which the first 5.x-STABLE release is
> announced on the freebsd.org webpage is also the day that this list becomes
> appropriate for 5.x questions. I figure that's a pretty safe indicator.
Then where should questions about 4.x go? I'm not upgrading yet, and
may not be for a while (at least not for all machines).
GH
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: 4-stable termios diff behaviour lc/lc_r"
- In reply to: Charles Ulrich: "Re: What is Stable"
- Next in thread: Kevin Oberman: "Re: What is Stable"
- Reply: Kevin Oberman: "Re: What is Stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
