Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone
From: Dave Horsfall (dave_at_horsfall.org)
Date: 01/30/05
- Previous message: Oliver Lehmann: "writeprotected floppy not unmountable on STABLE"
- In reply to: Holger Kipp: "Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:37:22 +1100 (EST)
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Holger Kipp wrote:
> > I'm fine with this plan for 6-CURRENT. For 5-STABLE, it's a major
> > user-visible change, and that is something that we promised to avoid
> > with stable branches.
>
> It violates POLA on 5-STABLE, and it will violate POLA on 6-CURRENT,
> especially as most perl programmers assume /usr/bin/perl to be the
> correct path.
I have *never* assumed that Perl was in /usr/bin, so for me the POLA
simply doesn't apply.
In fact, the POLA would seem to say that you don't put a 3rd-party
product into a system area.
-- Dave, who was taught by JohnL
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Oliver Lehmann: "writeprotected floppy not unmountable on STABLE"
- In reply to: Holger Kipp: "Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|