Re: ULE status

From: Frode Nordahl (frode_at_nordahl.net)
Date: 02/10/05

  • Next message: Marwan Burelle: "[5-STABLE] : CDRW burning problem - acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST" 
    Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:00:50 +0100
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

    On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30, Randy Bush wrote:
    > how about stability? last time i tried ule, the system died in
    > a few days.

    Don't know yet.

    I will keep trashing the server and post here if it crashes.

    Regards,
    Frode Nordahl

    > randy
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Marwan Burelle: "[5-STABLE] : CDRW burning problem - acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ULE status
      ... how about stability? ... last time i tried ule, ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: trap 12 with preempt (and ule)
      ... Randy Bush said: ... >> I wouldn't say ULE is completely instable. ... > very ill-advised to combine it with preemption. ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0
      ... cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or ... performance regression over the existing ULE. ... This patch replaces ULE ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0
      ... cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or ... performance regression over the existing ULE. ... This patch replaces ULE ...
      (freebsd-current)