Re: Xorg 6.8.1
From: Daniel O'Connor (doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au)
Date: 02/26/05
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread"
- In reply to: Godwin Stewart: "Xorg 6.8.1"
- Next in thread: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Scott: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:36, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
> reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
> seems to have died down now so I might consider the update, which might not
> be a bad idea given how many other ports are dependent on 6.8.1 and try to
> update half the system...
You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X API is
quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any problems. (I
did XFree86 -> Xorg with zero problems for example)
-- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread"
- In reply to: Godwin Stewart: "Xorg 6.8.1"
- Next in thread: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Scott: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|