Re: Xorg 6.8.1
From: Michael Nottebrock (michaelnottebrock_at_gmx.net)
Date: 02/26/05
- Previous message: Art Mason: "Re: Any hosting companies offering FreeBSD 5.3 yet?"
- In reply to: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Next in thread: Gary Kline: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Gary Kline: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100
On Saturday, 26. February 2005 13:05, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor"
>
> <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrote:
> > You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X
> > API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any
> > problems. (I did XFree86 -> Xorg with zero problems for example)
>
> No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to portupgrade
> something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg.
edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change it
to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-switching
for me.
-- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Art Mason: "Re: Any hosting companies offering FreeBSD 5.3 yet?"
- In reply to: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Next in thread: Gary Kline: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Gary Kline: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Re: Xorg 6.8.1"
- Reply: Godwin Stewart: "Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
