Re: 5.4pre panic
From: Rene Ladan (r.c.ladan_at_student.tue.nl)
Date: 03/30/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: new LORs on 5.4 pre"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:17:08 +0200 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:51:04AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > Got this panic with auto-reboot (no dump :( ), saved from dmesg on
> > 5.4pre 2003-05-29 09:49 UTC
> >
> > processor eflags = IOPL = 0
> > current process = 29 (swi1: net)
> > trap number = 3
> > panic: breakpoint instruction fault
>
> I'd have expected this panic to be the result of setting a breakpoint,
> i.e. requesting the kernel to panic at this location. Are you
> absolutely certain this is not the case?
I did not set a breakpoint, maybe some application was doing it for me.
I was working in X at the moment.
> If so, you should try to use
> DDB to obtain a traceback to find out what it was doing.
I have DDB/KDB in my kernelconfig, but auto-reboot without dump doesn't
help much, does it?
>
> Kris
Regards,
Rene
-- "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: new LORs on 5.4 pre"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 5.4pre panic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|