Re: unexpected panic in idle process (RELENG_5 2005/04/25UTC)
From: Adrian Steinmann (ast_at_marabu.ch)
Date: 05/09/05
- Previous message: Daniel Eischen: "Re: Performance issue"
- In reply to: Doug White: "Re: unexpected panic in idle process (RELENG_5 2005/04/25UTC)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:52:21 +0200 To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, I wrote:
> Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc05e8ca2
> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7499d10
> frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7499d10
> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> current process = 11 (idle)
> [thread pid 11 tid 100003 ]
> Stopped at cpu_idle_default+0x5: leave
and Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> answered on Sun, 8 May 2005:
This is an odd one; the IA32 manual doesn't say you can take a GPF from a
LEAVE instruction in protected mode. %ebp looks correct so I'd wonder if
you have cooling problems or a bad processor.
Yes, odd, but maybe there is a simpler explanation: I have DDB
enabled, and the serial console may have sent a spurious break.
After nobody suggested any smart commands for db> I issued a "c"
and tadda, the system was back (albeit with the wrong time). So
this may be a red herring.
Thanks for the analysis.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Daniel Eischen: "Re: Performance issue"
- In reply to: Doug White: "Re: unexpected panic in idle process (RELENG_5 2005/04/25UTC)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]