Re: nForce 4, SATA Drive only runs at UDMA33?
From: alan bryan (alanbryan1234_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/23/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Next in thread: alan bryan: "Re: nForce 4, SATA Drive only runs at UDMA33?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:55:29 -0700 (PDT) To: dwhite@gumbysoft.com
> (manually retyped as the machine locks)
> ata2: CONNECT REQUESTED
> ata2: DISCONNECT REQUESTED
> ... (lots of those)
> subdisk6: detached
> ad6: detached
> ata2: SATA connect status=00000000
> ata3: SATA connect ready time=0ms
OK, it may not be so much a lock up as I was just a
bit impatient. After a while it panics with:
Fatal trap 12 Page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address 0x20c
There's a bunch more that I can write down if that
helps. Maybe I need to take a digital picture of the
screen before it reboots as I'm a slow writer.
Thanks for the help, I'd love to have this thing
running at it's capable speed potential.
This is my main workstation/desktop. I could update
to -CURRENT if anyone thinks that will solve the disk
speed problem without causing too many more. (Just do
average desktop stuff like KDE3) If -CURRENT is in
too much flux right now though maybe I'm better off
with working but slow.
--Alan Bryan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Next in thread: alan bryan: "Re: nForce 4, SATA Drive only runs at UDMA33?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]