Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)
From: Matthias Buelow (mkb_at_incubus.de)
Date: 05/25/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 06:38:59 +0200 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I think it's your mouse fighting with your sound card for Giant.
And why does it also happen (if not as badly but still) on my notebook
where there's no such conflict?
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 2959195 99
irq1: atkbd0 34101 1
irq6: fdc0 4 0
irq11: cbb0 cbb1++* 373638 12
irq12: psm0 267 0
irq13: npx0 1 0
irq14: ata0 374788 12
Total 3741994 126
mkb.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|