Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 05/31/05
- Previous message: Sebastian Ahndorf: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- In reply to: Sebastian Ahndorf: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Next in thread: Tod McQuillin: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Reply: Tod McQuillin: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:53:40 -0700 To: Sebastian Ahndorf <webmaster@it-is-warlock.de>
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Sebastian Ahndorf wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>Both sides must have same config, autosense should work if there is no
> >>config possibility in other end.
> >
> >
> >autosense may in fact not work, especially on low-quality NICs like rl.
> >
>
> I don't agree to that.
> I had similar problems with my network using a cheap switch with some
> realtek nics. I had the nics running 100baseTX Full Duplex.
> Changing this to autosense made the problems gone.
Your one example does not disprove the statement. I've seen this
problem myself, and so have many others.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Sebastian Ahndorf: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- In reply to: Sebastian Ahndorf: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Next in thread: Tod McQuillin: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Reply: Tod McQuillin: "Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
