Re: libstdc++ version bump.

From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/28/05

  • Next message: David O'Brien: "Re: libstdc++ version bump." 
    Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:28:47 -0700
To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>

    On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
    > On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote:
    >
    > > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above
    > > libraries?
    >
    > Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI
    > backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, too, but I'm not sure.

    There was. 3.3 could support either the C++ ABI of GCC 3.2, in which
    there was an implementation bug; or the fixed ABI of 3.4. I had hoped we
    had gone with the fixed ABI rather than being G++ 3.2 compatible, but
    that is what users wanted at the time. 

    -- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: David O'Brien: "Re: libstdc++ version bump."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: libstdc++ version bump.
      ... > Yes, it's a well known-fact. ... In fact there might have been a break of ABI ... could support either the C++ ABI of GCC 3.2, ... or the fixed ABI of 3.4. ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Best FFI?
      ... interface to your C++ code, there isn't going to be a lot of things that ... will support the C++ ABI. ... stable, C ABI, while pretty much every C++ compiler has their own ABI, ...
      (comp.lang.functional)
    • Re: Shared library version bump?
      ... I assume htat EVENTUALLY we will bump numbers again when something sufficiently ... big needs to be done to the ABI. ... Symbol versioning is suppose to allow one library to support different ... I believe Solaris has had one only version of libc from day one ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: libstdc++ version bump.
      ... Michael Nottebrock wrote: ... >> libraries? ... > Yes, it's a well known-fact. ... In fact there might have been a break of ABI ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Shared library version bump?
      ... you have to keep shims for any old 7.0+ ABIs ... I assume htat EVENTUALLY we will bump numbers again when something sufficiently ... big needs to be done to the ABI. ... Symbol versioning is suppose to allow one library to support different ...
      (freebsd-current)