Re: Consistent file system hang with RELENG_6 of today ...

From: Marc G. Fournier (scrappy_at_hub.org)
Date: 07/29/05

  • Next message: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: Consistent file system hang with RELENG_6 of today ..."
    Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:22:41 -0300 (ADT)
    To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
    
    

    And now, to follow up on my original ... I now have two core dumps, if
    anyone is interested :)

    To give some details as to what I'm trying to do here, and how ...

    I have a RELENG_6 machine, updated this afternoon, that I am trying to run
    a 4.x based jail environment on ... and these are what are live/running
    on my 6 productions 4.x machines right now ...

    I have COMPAT_FREEBSD4 built into the kernel:

    > strings /boot/kernel/kernel | grep -i COMPAT_ | grep __options
    ___options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!]
    ___options COMPAT_FREEBSD4

    Now, as most of the "old timers" here know, my jail environment makes use
    of unionfs to "mount" a template layer, to share common binaries amongst
    the VMs ...

    I have tried two different ways of doing this, both result in the exact
    same 'file system hang' ... and I have a core of each 'method' ...

    The first was to use mount_devfs to, of course, mount the /dev directory
    within the jail itself ...

    The second, I used the same /dev that existed within the jail, based on
    bulding a jail using a 4.x system ...

    In both cases, the hang appears to be at the same spot, where 'sendmail'
    (in this case, the postfix port) starts up ...

    In both cases, I was able to enter DDB using CTL-ALT-ESC and create a
    dump, but, unlike a server crash, where you just basically bt the core
    file, I really haven't got a clue where to even start to provide
    information from the core's themselves ...

    So, is there anyone out there able/willing to provide some direction on
    providing more information?

    Thanks ...

    On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

    >
    > 'k, I'm starting to play with 6.x, for our new server ... my priority right
    > now is to just have it run the existing 'jail' environments from my 4.x
    > machine, while I work on getting all of our servers up to 6.x, and then will
    > worry about the jail's themselves ...
    >
    > When I try and startup the 4.x jail on my 6.x machine, it "hangs" the file
    > system that the jail directory hierarchy happens to be mounted on though ...
    > twice in a row so far ...
    >
    > Now, I'm suspecting (and am going to try without it) that it might be because
    > I'm mounting devfs within the 4.x jail, but even then, it shouldn't hang
    > things up, only generate a whack of errors ...
    >
    > I have a good dump (CTL-ALT-ESC -> panic), but do not have a clue what to
    > offer from within there that might be of any use ...
    >
    > If anyone is interested ... ?
    >
    > thanks ...
    >
    > ----
    > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
    > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
    >

    ----
    Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
    Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: Consistent file system hang with RELENG_6 of today ..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Getty in jail causes 60+ core dumps/sec
      ... I have a jail installed on a virtual disk, ... 60 or so signal 11 core dumps per second. ... Protect your identity with Yahoo! ... Mail AddressGuard ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Awesome
      ... rushomancy@xxxxxxxxx (Cabeza Borradora) wrote: ... I'm arguing is that we shouldn't literally _hang_ the guy. ... He won't go to jail unless he's convicted in a court of law. ... IIRC even Nixon got a pension. ...
      (rec.music.progressive)
    • Re: Awesome
      ... I'm arguing is that we shouldn't literally _hang_ the guy. ... He won't go to jail unless he's convicted in a court of law. ... My bitch is with people like Fell saying we should hang him when we're still ...
      (rec.music.progressive)
    • Re: More evidence against Ullrich
      ... i'm not sure what you mean by "hang" jan. if you didn't know, ... i guess he could go to jail on the criminal charge, ... Michael Press ...
      (rec.bicycles.racing)
    • Re: Awesome
      ... rushomancy@xxxxxxxxx (Cabeza Borradora) wrote: ... I'm arguing is that we shouldn't literally _hang_ the guy. ... He won't go to jail unless he's convicted in a court of law. ...
      (rec.music.progressive)