Re: 6.0 and -O2 option
From: Norberto Meijome (freebsd_at_meijome.net)
Date: 08/29/05
- Previous message: Mark Kirkwood: "Re: Sysinstall automatic filesystem size generation."
- In reply to: Rene Ladan: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Next in thread: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Reply: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:52:01 +1000 To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@student.tue.nl>
Rene Ladan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 04:30:19PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>
>>As for 5.x notes about -O2 (libalias, gcc) were removed at revision
>>1.229.2.7 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf. But for 6.0-BETA3
>>we do have these warnings. Should they be removed as for 5.x? Is it
>>safe to use -O2 to build/install kernel, world, ports fro 6.0?
>>
>
> Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised.
Hi,
I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is
-O2 not advised for ports on 6.0?
cheers,
Beto
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mark Kirkwood: "Re: Sysinstall automatic filesystem size generation."
- In reply to: Rene Ladan: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Next in thread: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Reply: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
