Re: 6.0 and -O2 option
From: Jim C. Nasby (decibel_at_decibel.org)
Date: 08/31/05
- Previous message: Martin Dorschler: "USB Drive(s) not detected on P4SCE Motherboard under FreeBSD"
- In reply to: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:01:37 -0500 To: Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:57:53AM +1000, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> > > Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised.
> >
> > Hi,
> > I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is
> > -O2 not advised for ports on 6.0?
> > cheers,
> > Beto
>
> Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused
> bad code in some circumstances.
Is there an automated way to identify those ports so they can be forced
not to use -O higer than -O1?
-- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Martin Dorschler: "USB Drive(s) not detected on P4SCE Motherboard under FreeBSD"
- In reply to: Robert Backhaus: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 6.0 and -O2 option"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
