Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)
From: Tim Howe (tim.howe_at_celebrityresorts.com)
Date: 09/25/05
- Previous message: Robert Zagarello: "Re: [freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]: lpt0 always busy"
- In reply to: Billy Newsom: "Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)"
- Next in thread: Michael L. Squires: "5.4-STABLE changes breaks IDE boot (was Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2))"
- Reply: Michael L. Squires: "5.4-STABLE changes breaks IDE boot (was Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:10:20 -0400
Billy Newsom <smartweb@leadhill.net> writes:
> See these threads:
>
> critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
> 9/23/2005 12:07 AM
>
> ATA lockup with 5.4-STABLE
> 9/21/2005 10:19 PM
Thanks for the references; I'll definiteluy take a look at them (only
reason I haven't before replying is that I'm mobile currently and don't
feel like digging through archives on the itty bitty screen.
> Anyway, I count three systems that are normally boting with 5.3 or
> 5.4, and then the upgrade to the latest 5-Stable breaks the boot.
If I may make a small correction, I would like to point out that it's
not 5-STABLE that breaks mine but 5.4-RELEASE. Even booting from the
5.4 mini-CD can't find the drive, but booting from the 5.3 installer
can.
>
> Perhaps you could test one of those identical machines with a simple
> hard disk swap? Just put the bad booting drive in a working system and
> see if the error is still there?
I can do this either today or tomorrow.
> Has anyone checked the CVS repository for a possible change to the ATA
> detection or boot code?
Since you mentioned that 5.4-RELEASE worked for you but -STABLE didn't,
I've got a build of RELENG_5 (is this still active in comparison to
RELENG_6?) going now. Perhaps what broke yours fixed mine. In any case
it will be helpful for patching against and testing.
> Can you post your dmesg for 5.3 perhaps?
Yes.
> BTW, you can boot that machine to the old kernel using the procedure
If you think it will be helpful I can. Will this produce a different
result than booting from the 5.3 installer?
-- Tim Howe Software Engineer Celebrity Resorts, Inc. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robert Zagarello: "Re: [freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]: lpt0 always busy"
- In reply to: Billy Newsom: "Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)"
- Next in thread: Michael L. Squires: "5.4-STABLE changes breaks IDE boot (was Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2))"
- Reply: Michael L. Squires: "5.4-STABLE changes breaks IDE boot (was Re: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: [9fans] $sysname isnt set in the live part of the iso
... download", booting the 'live' part of the iso gives an error, because ...
$sysname isn't set (booting the installer does work, ... (comp.os.plan9) - Re: The success of an Etch
... Nate Bargmann wrote: ... the net-install image. ... "installgui"
would start the GUI installer. ... But I find that booting with vga=791 and using
'install' makes for a clearer display than 'installgui' ... (Debian-User) - Re: Installing RedHat 9 on a USB Hard Disk
... that was then again visible when booting into WindowsXP. ... Thus - the Linux
loaded by the installer can see my USB harddrive and mount ... > But when I get
to the point where I must partition the harddrive, ... (linux.redhat.install) - Re: MBR deleted - reinstall grub
... where exactly in the process following booting with the installer do we ...
give this mount command? ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
... (Debian-User) - Re: difference between NTFS and FAT?
... The main reason I can think of for using FAT32 is if I were dual ...
booting but had a partition shared between two operating systems, ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)