Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 09/27/05
- Previous message: Folkert Saathoff: "IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- In reply to: Folkert Saathoff: "IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Next in thread: Folkert Saathoff: "Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Reply: Folkert Saathoff: "Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:52:25 -0700 To: Folkert Saathoff <folkert@feedface.com>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Folkert Saathoff wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello lists,
>
> in order to evaluate the latency penalty induced by mobile IPv6,
> i need some way to simulate different latencies between two nodes
> in a laboratory environment.
>
> Is it possible at the moment to shape IPv6 traffic with KAME SNAP
> 20050919
> and FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE?
>
> If not, is there some other way to enforce latencies on an interface?
Upgrade to 6.0 and use the IPv6 support in ipfw/dummynet.
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Folkert Saathoff: "IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- In reply to: Folkert Saathoff: "IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Next in thread: Folkert Saathoff: "Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Reply: Folkert Saathoff: "Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
