Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 10/30/05
- Previous message: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Cristiano Deana: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Cristiano Deana: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:49:48 -0500 To: Cristiano Deana <cristiano.deana@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> 'DEFAULTS':
>
> device isa
>
> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> device io # I/O device
>
> Why?
> What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized 'GENERIC'?
It's included by DEFAULT.
> Or those lines are no more mandatory?
The point of a DEFAULTS file is that to contain things that are used
by DEFAULT, including those which are mandatory.
> I think it should be written in 'UPDATING'.
No action is necessary.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Cristiano Deana: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Cristiano Deana: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]