Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Massimo Lusetti (massimo_at_cedoc.mo.it)
Date: 10/30/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Arnold: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Mathieu Arnold: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:53:55 +0100
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 11:36 +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> 'DEFAULTS':
>
> device isa
>
> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> device io # I/O device
>
> Why?
> What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized 'GENERIC'?
> Or those lines are no more mandatory?
DEFAULTS will be included automatically by the new config(8), quoting
from markm@
"Its an anti-foot-shooting thing. Scott was concerned that far too many
people with kernels based on GENERIC before io was made a separate
module were being flummoxed by X not running. This is a way to make
npx, mem and io default for even those kernels, as long as they run a
modern(tm) config(8)."
Look for discussion in cvs-src@.
-- Massimo.run(); _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Arnold: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Mathieu Arnold: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|