Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Pete Slagle (freebsd-stable_at_box559.com)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Dmitry Morozovsky: "Re: gmirror panic @ RELENG_5/amd64"
- In reply to: Philip S. Schulz: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Roland Smith: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Roland Smith: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:22:09 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
>> 'DEFAULTS':
>>
>> device isa
>>
>> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
>> device io # I/O device
>>
>> Why?
>> What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized
>> 'GENERIC'?
>> Or those lines are no more mandatory?
>>
>
> No, you don't need to include 'DEFAULTS', config(8) will take care of
> that for you.
>
> http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510271713.j9RHDNTo013082
>
> AFAICT, this was done in order to automatically include devices which
> are essential in most cases so less experienced users won't accidentally
> break their systems and later complain that e.g. X doesn't work anymore.
The whole mechanism seems like an obvious POLA violation. All the more
so without a note in UPDATING.
Personally, I prefer less automated "help." In general, it might be
better to encourage those who need a nanny to run Windows, leaving
FreeBSD unencumbered for those who don't. IMHO.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dmitry Morozovsky: "Re: gmirror panic @ RELENG_5/amd64"
- In reply to: Philip S. Schulz: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Roland Smith: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Roland Smith: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|