Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Danny Braniss (danny_at_cs.huji.ac.il)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Maybe in reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:46:37 +0200
> You've clearly never spent much time on the FreeBSD support forums,
> where every few days someone posts for help
>
> 1) with an error caused by removing one of those "Do not remove this!"
> lines, and
>
> 2) for help on getting X working when they forgot to add /dev/io and
> /dev/mem to their kernel.
>
> Those of us who spend a lot of time answering such questions will
> surely welcome the change, since it will hopefully reduce our
> workload.
>
I understand - and appreciate, your problem. I still think that
the solution is wrong. I'm now checking, since it seems that io and
mem are loadable modules, that maybe the X start, or rc.d will make sure
that these modules are loaded? So that if someone who removes them from the
MYKERNCONF is still protected?
danny
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Maybe in reply to: Cristiano Deana: "GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]