Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:50:44 -0500 To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > You've clearly never spent much time on the FreeBSD support forums,
> > where every few days someone posts for help
> >
> > 1) with an error caused by removing one of those "Do not remove this!"
> > lines, and
> >
> > 2) for help on getting X working when they forgot to add /dev/io and
> > /dev/mem to their kernel.
> >
> > Those of us who spend a lot of time answering such questions will
> > surely welcome the change, since it will hopefully reduce our
> > workload.
> >
> I understand - and appreciate, your problem. I still think that
> the solution is wrong. I'm now checking, since it seems that io and
> mem are loadable modules, that maybe the X start, or rc.d will make sure
> that these modules are loaded? So that if someone who removes them from the
> MYKERNCONF is still protected?
Many users who build custom kernels do not build modules, since they
want to compile everything they (think they) need into the kernel
statically.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: Danny Braniss: "Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]