Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming
From: Scott Long (scottl_at_samsco.org)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- In reply to: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Next in thread: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Reply: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:42:32 -0700 To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Warner Losh wrote:
>>>The ACPI+sio problem is known. I have a motherboard with a similar
>>>problem, though a different brand than yours. I solved it by removing
>>>the ACPI attachment from the sio code. The better solution is to allow
>>>loader hints to override ACPI hints. I tried talking to John Baldwin
>>>about this but didn't get much of a response.
>>
>>I've tried all suggestions so far, but to no avail on most servers. Too
>>many broken ACPI implementations I fear... Too bad motherboard vendors
>>don't take the time to push proper software in their flash.
>
>
> Right now acpi tells us there's a device, and we use it. Loader hints
> should be used to map locations to device instances. It is more
> general than just ACPI, however. People want to bind sio to a
> specific port that comes out the back. People also want to bind rl0
> to the card in slot 3.
>
> Consider my system:
> sio0 pnpinfo _HID=PNP0501 _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.UAR1
> sio1 pnpinfo _HID=PNP0501 _UID=2 at handle=\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.UAR2
>
> On this system, UAR1 is the port that comes out the back, so I have
> what I want. However, I'd like to be able to say:
>
> hint.sio.0.at="acpi"
> hint.sio.0.location="\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.UAR2"
>
> or
>
> hint.sio.0.at="acpi"
> hint.sio.0.location="UAR2"
>
> or
>
> hint.fxp.0.at="pci"
> hint.fxp.0.location="bus=2 slot=3 function=0"
> hint.fxp.1.at="pci"
> hint.fxp.1.location="pci2:2:0"
>
> Since we really want to map the devices in some arbitrary ACPI tree to
> instances in the system, rather than mapping devices that happen to
> live at a specific resource address to specific instances in the tree.
>
> However, there are a number of issues in doing this generically and
> with error cases. How does one deal with the different syntaxes?
> What extensions to the newbus system are there? etc.
>
> Warner
Well, in my case at least, what ACPI says about the sio resources is
simply wrong, and I'm not smart enough to figure out how to correct the
ASL or get it loaded correctly on boot. It would be easier if the
sio-acpi attachment honored the hints that already exist for the purpose
of describing the sio resources. Last I checked, neither Windows nor
Linux nor Solaris required users to read the ACPI 2.0 spec to get their
comms ports working. Having the flexibility to do what you describe
above would be nice, but allowing mortal users to get their hardware
working would be ever nicer.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- In reply to: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Next in thread: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Reply: Warner Losh: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
