Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
From: Philippe PEGON (Philippe.Pegon_at_crc.u-strasbg.fr)
Date: 11/02/05
- Previous message: David Wolfskill: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Ken Menzel: "Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: *** hoogendijk: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: *** hoogendijk: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:27:15 +0100 To: Ken Menzel <kenm@icarz.com>
Ken Menzel wrote:
>> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
>>
>> nooptions WITNESS
>> nooptions WITNESS_SKIP_SPIN
>
>
> If I include GENERIC can I comment out the following?
> #cpu I486_CPU
> #cpu I586_CPU
>
> Does this make any difference? I have always done this out of habit.
> would it become
in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES we can read :
#
# You must specify at least one CPU (the one you intend to run on);
# deleting the specification for CPUs you don't need to use may make
# parts of the system run faster.
#
cpu I486_CPU
cpu I586_CPU # aka Pentium(tm)
cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm)
>
> nocpu I486_CPU ?
>
> Or is this irrelevant as the build knows what CPU I have?
if the description is true, it's relevant ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
-- Philippe PEGON _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David Wolfskill: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- In reply to: Ken Menzel: "Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Next in thread: *** hoogendijk: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Reply: *** hoogendijk: "Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]