Re: interesting nit
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 11/27/05
- Previous message: Subhro: "Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD"
- In reply to: Michael Butler: "interesting nit"
- Next in thread: Michael Butler: "Re: interesting nit"
- Reply: Michael Butler: "Re: interesting nit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:38:34 -0500 To: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:39:42PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> Just a generic 'heads-up', since this is an unsupported optimisation,
> and a question; compiling a kernel with '-march=pentium2' mostly works
> with the only observed problem being that something is amiss with the
> kernel PLL for NTP. The clock drifts beyond the bounds that NTPD will
> correct :-( Does this impact any other '-march' variants?
You forgot to mention any details about your FreeBSD version :-)
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Subhro: "Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD"
- In reply to: Michael Butler: "interesting nit"
- Next in thread: Michael Butler: "Re: interesting nit"
- Reply: Michael Butler: "Re: interesting nit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]