Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 11/28/05
- Previous message: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- In reply to: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Next in thread: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Reply: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:14:40 -0500 To: Eirik ?verby <ltning@anduin.net>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:54:30PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I have found the culprit. There must be some sort of
> difference between the machines after all (BIOS revision?), because
> while on one machine the interrupt rate for the bge card stays very
> low (2 to be exact) during maximum load, the other machine goes
> beyond 1000 and keeps rising constantly. This might also explain why
> performance slowly degrades over time on that machine, and response
> times vary wildly, while the "fast" machine responds nicely within
> 1-2 seconds no matter the load and testing time.
>
> I will have to investigate this more closely. Is there a way to force
> the NIC to polling mode (I'm assuming that is the difference, an IRQ
> rate of 2 is too low for a heavily loaded server if the NIC is
> interrupt-driven)?
>
> Anything else I could look at?
BIOS update.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- In reply to: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Next in thread: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Reply: Eirik Øverby: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]