Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?
From: Eirik Oeverby (ltning_at_anduin.net)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Eric Anholt: "Current DRM for 6-STABLE"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:09 +0100 (CET) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
>> Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
>> However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC address differences):
>>
>> 30c30
>> < Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
>> ---
>>> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
>>
>> What on earth is that all about? The "slow" box has the ACPI-fast
>> timecounter...
>
> Could be ACPI bugs on your system:
Yes, but the other system is 100% equal - hardware, bios config, bios and
bootblock revision, controller bioses, etc. etc.
It all matches.
Should I complain to HP?
/Eirik
>
>>> BIOS update.
>
> Kris
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Eric Anholt: "Current DRM for 6-STABLE"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
