Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- From: Pete French <petefrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:25:42 +0000
> What I am trying to decide is whether there any point in making the jump
> from a very stable RELENG_5 system to RELENG_6. AIUI the ULE scheduler
> and it's associated options optimize the use of multiple CPUs and by
> staying with 4BSD I'm not getting the best performance from my system.
I'm not using ULE either - but I got a 15 percent speedup out of our SMP
systems when moving from RELENG_5 to 6.0-RELEASE. Definitely worth doing
in my opinion and am now upgrading all the production systems to 6.0
> Can anyone offer any advice on this please?
Yes, do it. Its a definite improvement.
-pcf.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- From: Mark Ovens
- RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- Prev by Date: Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- Next by Date: Help For upgrading Releng4.11 stable to 6.0 stable
- Previous by thread: Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- Next by thread: Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
