Re: Have the device names for hard discs been changed? (fwd)
- From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:49:56 +1030
On Monday 30 January 2006 15:27, Ken Bolingbroke wrote:
> You start out with a disk, /dev/ad6, and you "dangerously dedicate" it,
> then you _should_ have 's1' appended to /dev/ad6 to make /dev/ad6s1. But
> for some reason, it's appending it to /dev/ad6c instead to make
> /dev/ad6cs1, and then sysinstall tries to label the disk with /dev/ad6cs1c,
> etc, and fails. (Note the _two_ 'c' characters in that device name)
>
> My work around so far is after using fdisk in sysinstall to "dangerously
> dedicate" my disk, I exit, then "rm /dev/ad6cs1", then go back to
> sysinstall and label the disk, and then it will correctly use /dev/ad6s1.
If you're using 5.x or 6.x which have devfs, it would point to a bug in geom
(or somewhere in the kernel anyway) as the device names are generated inside
the kernel.
Personally I'd just stick to not using dangerously dedicated.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Attachment:pgppN26acrDzV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: Have the device names for hard discs been changed? (fwd)
- From: Ken Bolingbroke
- Re: Have the device names for hard discs been changed? (fwd)
- Prev by Date: Re: Have the device names for hard discs been changed? (fwd)
- Next by Date: KDE 3.5.0 seems much chubbier than 3.4.2
- Previous by thread: Re: Have the device names for hard discs been changed? (fwd)
- Next by thread: KDE 3.5.0 seems much chubbier than 3.4.2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
