Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- From: pongthep <pkrisada@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 02:06:17 +0700
What is the main difference between them, in brief?
I only use /usr/include and I've never used /usr/local/include.
thanks,
pongthep
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:56:55PM -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> > I'm having a little problem with compiling programs.
> >
> > It seems that gcc does not search /usr/local/include for headers by
> > default; I have to specify -I/usr/local/include. It seems to me that it
> > should.
> >
> > So:
> >
> > Should gcc be searching /usr/local/include by default?
>
> No, if you want to look for third-party headers you need to point the
> compiler there yourself.
>
> Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- Prev by Date: Re: "couldn't map interrupt" problems with updated 6.0 kernel
- Next by Date: Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- Previous by thread: Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- Next by thread: Re: GCC not searching /usr/local/include
- Index(es):