Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:00:05 +0100
but i need a working OS, not a bata !
If you don't like using a beta (nothing wrong with that), you definitely should not be using -stable either. There are even less promises regarding the reliability and quality of -stable than there are of a beta. After all, during the prerelease and beta cycles, the tree is getting in shape for a release and there is a focus on fixing as many little nits as possible. In between releases, bigger MFCs might hit -stable from time to time and make it less reliable.
So, while you are getting confused by the branch name changing, you should also rethink whether you want -stable at all. It really seems like you should be aiming for RELENG_5_4 (and then RELENG_5_5 once 5.5 is out) instead.
- Bartosz
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Kevin Oberman
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Jon Holstrom
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- References:
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Jon Holstrom
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Chris
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- From: Jon Holstrom
- Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- Prev by Date: Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- Next by Date: Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- Previous by thread: Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- Next by thread: Re: freeBSD 5.5 Prerelease ( 5.4 stable )
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|