Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- From: "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:33:09 -0600
On 3/27/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:05:13PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote:
Why does GCC produce faster code using "-march=pentium2
-mtune=pentium4" on a Pentium 4 chip versus plain -march=pentium4?
Try it...
CPUTYPE=pentium2
CFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4
COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4
Talk to the gcc developers (and provide benchmarks).
What would be an adequate, proof, benchmark? I've already run several
tests with nbench, testing all of the possible configurations of
-march and -mtune.
--
BSD Podcasts @ http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- References:
- -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- From: Nikolas Britton
- Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- From: Kris Kennaway
- -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fresh CVSup of RELENG_6 fails buildworld
- Next by Date: Re: 6.1-PRERELEASE: freezing
- Previous by thread: Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- Next by thread: Re: -march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
- Index(es):