Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:02:00 -0400
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:32 AM 25/04/2006, Stephen Clark wrote:That increased it to 39mbits/sec. Still far from 54mbits/sec
Hello List,
I have to dualcore Athlon 64 4800+ systems. Initially I was running 4.9 on both of them an was able to get 54mbits thru direct connected realtek 10/100 cards as measured by nttcp.
I put stable on one of the system and now can on get 37mbits as measured by nttcp when going thru an ipsec tunnel.
Try first
sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
If its still slower, try using FAST_IPSEC instead on the server. However, make sure you disable INET6
---Mike
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- References:
- Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- From: Stephen Clark
- Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- Prev by Date: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by Date: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Previous by thread: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- Next by thread: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
