Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:45:39 -0400
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:43:14PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
KK> OK, I wish you and others had responded to my call for testing a month
KK> or more ago :) All (both) of the responses indicated that the quota
KK> problems had been fixed following changes made then. At this point it
KK> may be too late for 6.x, but we'll see.
Well, I'm quite sure this change is not too disruptive, and it *does* fix quota
panics, so I hope RE will aprove this (CC:'d)
It's already approved, I'll merge it later today. It's not the cause
of real-world problems though (only when DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS is enabled).
Kris
Attachment:
pgpnImy2bTILZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Chris Dillon
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Prev by Date: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by Date: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- Previous by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Index(es):