Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:37:37 -0400
Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is true, but I hope you recognise that a good part of the
responsibility for this falls on the users when asked to test proposed
fixes. If the developers are not aware of remaining problems they
can't reasonably be expected to fix them :-)
Indeed, but the developers should also realize that a lot of users have servers in production and can not afford the downtime, or simply don't have the resources to test. I think the developers should also spend a little more time doing more extensive testing of their own code.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: JoaoBR
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Vlad Skvortsov
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Torfinn Ingolfsen
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- References:
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Chris Dillon
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Prev by Date: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by Date: CFT: new ath hal
- Previous by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|