Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Adrian Wontroba <aw1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:42:24 +0100
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:46:03PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
It could also be viewed as irresponsible to have servers in production
_without_ a corresponding test system to test proposed changes on.
True, but some us are blessed with a collection of assorted ancient cast
off servers, and can not justify to money focused management a test
system for every type of production server / function.
We then sometimes pay the price for doing things on the cheap when an
exotic bug strikes in less heavily exercised code.
If you're different and you know it, test! (or clap your hands in woe?)
--
Adrian Wontroba
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Chris Dillon
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- From: Torfinn Ingolfsen
- Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Prev by Date: Re: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset channel 5 (2432 Mhz, flags 0x3e0 hal flags 0x140)
- Next by Date: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
- Previous by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Next by thread: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|