Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- From: Doug Hardie <bc979@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:57:02 -0700
On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:12, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
options QUOTA
This definitely effects performance on 6.x since it makes your
filesystem giant-locked, which may also interfere with your network
processing.
Any indications when this will be fixed? I need quota for user's files.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- References:
- RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov
- Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- From: Kris Kennaway
- RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- Prev by Date: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- Next by Date: BioStar Tforce4 6100-939 MB with Nvidia Nforce 410 chipset
- Previous by thread: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- Next by thread: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- Index(es):